Uploaded on 2017-08-18 by Judah Marsden

1: 1- Vienna, Austria 2- Stockholm, Sweden 3- Zurich, Switzerland 4- Copenhagen, Denmark 5- Lund, Sweden 2: 1-Access to public facilities and resources. 2-Design and manageability. 3-Public support to citizens. 4-Impact of city on environment and resiliency of infrastructure. 5-Influence of environment on effectiveness of population. 3: 1-San Francisco has an ample amount of public facilities and resources but they are not constantly updated. 2-The city is designed effectively and is manageable to be transported around, however public transportation is not free. 3-The city aids its citizens to an extent by providing some resources to live a viable life but there is a major vagrancy problem. 4-The city heavily impacts the environment surrounding it with its underlying industrial machine and the infrastructure is somewhat resilient to the natural occurrences happening in the area as well as the actions of its citizens. 5-The city effectively influences its population by holding a radical drive for inspiration and a pleasant atmosphere in most areas. Solutions: 1-Constant interaction with citizens ideas to update public facilities and resources. 2-Create free public transportation system for ease of transportation. 3-Provide solution for vagrancy problem or support centres for citizens with troubles. 4-Cut down on industrial factory production in urban area and relocate to external hinterland. 5-Improve certain areas of the city by providing ample educational and job opportunities to inspire citizens lives and objectives.